The wooden structural posts and end gables of the granary are embellished with decorative carving, an expression of the value of its contents. (photo 1987)
i’ve been thinking and i think a lot of celebrity discourse wouldn’t be a thing if more people understood how PR works and that these famous people have been carefully curated as products for consumption 99% of the time. the reason a lot of actors seem so much like their characters is because, a lot of the time, they’re deliberately playing that aspect of themselves up to promote the project they’re in. why do you think so many straight actors starring in gay films have vaguely gay anecdotes prepared for interviews? why do you think leads promoting rom-coms often play up their chemistry in interviews? none of it is accidental. pedro pascal isn’t walking around calling himself daddy because he happens to genuinely call himself that. it makes him more marketable. i think a lot of us know that celebrities’ public personas are curated, but it doesn’t stick because we want to be entertained and to like these people. the more I interact with PR people as part of my job and am made aware of the “rules” surrounding celebrity interactions and interviews - the more I’ve realised just how much of a performance all of it is. now i am not saying it’s a Bad thing, i think this curation is mostly in place to protect privacy and keep promotion focused on the show/film. but i don’t think it would hurt for more people and fans to remember that almost everything you know and see about celebrities is incredibly curated and tunnel-visioned to make them living breathing promo material for whatever they’re in, which is to say that these are the last people who should be looked to as role models for moral and ethical guidance because they aren’t *for* that.
americans and their ways are so boring to me. therefore they should stop making tv shows about americans and explore life in the beautiful country of moldova
